Ada Palmer, Department of History at the University of Chicago on:
Why Pious Renaissance Scholars Read and Defend the Infamous Roman 'Atheist' Lucretius.
The Roman Epicurean poet Lucretius is often celebrated (or condemned) as a key figure in the development of modern secular thought. His scientific epic poem "On the Nature of Things (De Rerum Natura)" contains many radical ideas, including a physics based on atoms and vacuum, the first fully mechanical account of nature, ideas of species development and natural selection, and it denies divine creation, Providence, and the immortal soul. Because of the threat these ideas posed to Christianity, Lucretius and Epicureanism were much attacked by early Church Fathers, and throughout the Middle Ages 'Epicurean' appeared as a term of abuse, interchangeable with heretic, atheist, even sodomite. When Lucretius's poem was rediscovered in 1417, the first readers to study his work all knew his sinister reputation, but chose nonetheless to read, copy, and eventually publish this most infamous ancient. Close examination of surviving Renaissance manuscripts reveals that most of the scholars who risked their reputations to read and Lucretius also believed that his radical ideas were completely wrong. The notes and thoughts Renaissance readers scribbled in the margins of their copies of Lucretius reveal how and why comparatively orthodox scholars studied and defended this infamous author, and thus how the book survived to reach more receptive audiences in later centuries.
Ada Palmer will conduct a 45 minute academic lecture, followed by a short discussion on her works of science fiction.
Coffee and light refreshments provided.
Ada Palmer is the author of Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance (2014), Too Like the Lightning (2016), and Seven Surrenders (2017)
Sponsored by the Departments of Philosophy, Hispanic Studies, and History.
Lisa James - Hispanic Studies
William D'Alessandro - Philosophy